SEC Hypocrisy: Does Ripple Deserve Worse Than Terraform?

Overview

• The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently filed a lawsuit against Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, for allegedly conducting a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud.
• Ripple is facing legal action from the SEC for its stance that XRP is not a security while Terraform and Kwon are treated with significantly less severity, leading to questions about the SEC’s enforcement of cryptocurrency regulations.
• The case has major implications for the future of cryptocurrencies in the US and how they will be regulated going forward.

The SEC vs Terraform Labs

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is taking legal action against Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, for alleged securities fraud. Court documents suggest that the company sold an “inter-connected suite of crypto asset securities” through unregistered transactions and misled investors about the stability of their stablecoin, Anchor Protocol. Additionally, investors were not informed about the risks involved in investing in Anchor Protocol which promised to pay out 20% interest on USTC deposits.

Ripple’s Position

Ripple has been adamant in its position that XRP is not a security but rather just software code. This was partially affirmed when the SEC acknowledged this fact during their legal proceedings against Ripple. In response to this news, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse stressed that his company should be held to the same standards as Ethereum which was classified as non-securities by former SEC chief Jay Clayton back in 2018.

Implications of the Case

The ongoing court battle between Ripple and the SEC could have far-reaching implications for cryptocurrencies in general within the United States as it highlights an example of „regulation by enforcement“ within this industry. It could also provide insight into how other digital assets such as Bitcoin would be classified under existing laws if challenged by regulators in future cases.

Conclusion

Ultimately, these events serve as evidence that regulators are beginning to take cryptocurrency more seriously and are actively seeking ways to better regulate this emerging sector of finance moving forward. As such, it will be interesting to see what happens next between Ripple and the SEC as well as other cases involving cryptocurrency regulation across America in years to come!